MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405098204 · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2024.115043

Towards less carbon-intensive blue hydrogen: Integrated natural gas reforming and CO2 capture approach

2024· article· en· W4405098204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of environmental chemical engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural gasSteam reformingHydrogenHydrogen productionEnvironmental scienceWaste managementMethaneGreenhouse gasCarbon dioxide reformingCarbon fibersMethane reformerChemistrySyngasMaterials scienceEngineeringOrganic chemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As hydrogen emerges as a key enabler in the global transition to sustainable energy, blue hydrogen production technologies are gaining increased attention. While existing studies have evaluated the environmental and economic feasibility of blue hydrogen, a comprehensive and innovative assessment remains essential. This study introduces a novel integration of three natural gas reforming techniques: Steam Methane Reforming (SMR), CO 2 -based Autothermal Reforming (ATR), and Steam-based ATR, where the CO 2 -concentrated stream from SMR is utilized as feedstock for ATR—an approach not widely explored. A detailed thermodynamic analysis and process simulation are conducted for a 1 Mt/year hydrogen production plant, integrating a point-source CO 2 capture system. The high-CO 2 concentration stream from the reforming system is directed to an MEA-based capture unit for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), significantly reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A heat exchanger network is designed to minimize energy consumption, offering operational savings and enhanced process efficiency. Results indicate that at a 50% CO 2 capture rate, the carbon intensity is 3.13 kg CO 2 -eq/kg H 2 , which reduces to 1.25 kg CO 2 -eq/kg H 2 at a 80% CO 2 capture rate. The benchmarked cost of hydrogen production ranges from US$1.0/kg H 2 for carbon intensities of 0.45–1.5 kg CO 2 -eq/kg H 2 , decreasing with higher carbon intensity. Gas composition analysis across reforming techniques maximizes hydrogen yield while minimizing byproducts. Additionally, thermal management, pinch analysis, and sensitivity analyses provide valuable insights into system dynamics, identifying inefficiencies and opportunities to further enhance performance. • Integrated SMR, and ATR enhances CO 2 utilization for blue hydrogen production • CO 2 -concentrated stream from SMR used as feedstock for ATR reforming • 1Mt hydrogen plant simulated with detailed thermodynamic and process analysis • CO 2 capture rate of 90% reduces carbon intensity to 0.62 kg CO 2 -eq/kg H 2 . • Heat exchanger network designed to minimize energy use and enhance heat recovery • Cost of hydrogen production estimated at US$1.0/kg H 2 with low carbon intensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it