MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405098744 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16282

Advanced Visualization of Discrete-Event Systems Specification in 3D Building Information Modeling using Autodesk Forge Platform

2024· dissertation· en· W4405098744 on OpenAlexaff
Mitali Amritlal Patel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDEVSBuilding information modelingSystems engineeringDiscrete event simulationComputer scienceInformation modelEfficient energy useEnergy performanceEngineeringEvent (particle physics)VisualizationArchitectureArchitectural engineeringSoftware engineeringModeling and simulationSimulationMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achieving high building performance is integral to modern architecture, encompassing not only aesthetic considerations but also critical aspects of energy efficiency and sustainability.Modern buildings must integrate advanced design principles and energyefficient Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning systems to ensure optimal performance while maintaining occupant comfort.Addressing performance issues post-construction can be both challenging and expensive.To mitigate such risks, it is advantageous to evaluate and simulate building performance during the pre-design phase.This thesis introduces an integrated approach combining Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS) with Building Information Modeling (BIM) to enhance performance prediction and evaluation.By combining DEVS for detailed simulations with BIM for comprehensive modeling, this approach enables accurate pre-design assessments, reducing costly after-construction adjustments.Two case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in improving building efficiency, supporting high-performance buildings, and smart city goals.The integration also facilitates advanced design experiences, including gamification and virtual reality, offering new insights into building performance analysis and optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207