MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405102974 · doi:10.2118/214825-pa

Natural Gas Liquid Huff ’n’ Puff in Ultratight Shale Reservoirs: An Experimental and Modeling Study

2024· article· en· W4405102974 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Alinejad, Javad Behseresht, Hassan Dehghanpour

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringOil shaleSolventTight oilMiscibilityShale oilEnhanced oil recoveryUnconventional oilOil in placeChemistryPhase (matter)PorosityChemical engineeringMaterials scienceGeologyPetroleumOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Solvent huff ’n’ puff (HnP) is becoming a common enhanced oil recovery (EOR) practice in unconventional tight and ultratight reservoirs. For an effective HnP operation, achieving miscibility is essential for promoting solvent transport into the reservoir matrix and subsequent oil production. This is typically achieved by either increasing the injection pressure or enriching the solvent. However, injection pressure is constrained by compressor capacity, formation fracture pressure, and lateral/vertical containment. In this study, we experimentally assess the feasibility of using natural gas liquid (NGL) for HnP in an ultratight Eagle Ford (EF) shale sample, providing insights into extreme solvent enrichment scenarios in an HnP process. We hypothesize that NGL extracts oil from an oil-saturated shale core through a counterdiffusion process, primarily governed by first-contact miscibility (FCM) between NGL and oil. In this study, we explore the impact of solvent injection on the phase envelope of both dead oil and live oil during the HnP process. We present a critical comparison between C1 HnP, representing the lower limit of solvent enrichment, and NGL HnP, representing the upper limit, focusing on their respective oil recovery mechanisms and in-situ solvent-oil interactions. Using a high-pressure and high-temperature (HPHT) visualization apparatus, we investigate the interactions between NGL and oil, as well as their compositional variations, under bulk-phase conditions and in the core during the HnP process. We propose an analytical theory for the transport of NGL and oil into and out of an ultratight porous medium, explaining the experimental oil recoveries observed from the shale core. NGL and oil transport is modeled under a diffusion-dominated scenario, with FCM playing a crucial role in enhancing diffusion. Compositional analysis indicates that, contrary to C1, NGL extracts heavier oil components during the soaking stage. Core visualization demonstrates a gradual color change of NGL from clear to amber during soaking, indicating oil production via counterdiffusion. NGL expands the two-phase envelope of the dead oil, making it more volatile, while suppressing the phase envelope of the live oil. This potentially extends the duration of single-phase oil flow during the depletion stage in a live-oil system and enhances the oil production through diffusion. NGL achieves significantly lower FCM pressure (FCMP) with oil compared with C1, C1/C2 (70/30), C2, and separator gas, explaining its higher diffusion into the oil-saturated core. The analytical model demonstrates that NGL diffuses to the end of the core by the end of soaking. NGL recovers significantly more oil than C1 in the HnP process. Most of the oil is produced during soaking due to counterdiffusion, with solution-gas drive contributing additional recovery at later stages of depletion, though not as markedly as in C1 HnP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207