MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Applications of ISO 14046 Water Footprint Assessment for Sustainable Water Management in Dairy Production

2024· book-chapter· en· W4405106496 on OpenAlexaff
U.P.K. Hettiarachchi, V. M. Jayasooriya, Shobha Muthukumaran

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in environmental engineering and green technologies book series · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceWater useFootprintDairy industryWastewaterProduction (economics)Ice creamWater consumptionEnvironmental engineeringAgricultural scienceWater resource managementBusinessGeographyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter provides an in-depth analysis of water footprints within the dairy industry, recognized globally as a significant consumer of water. Utilizing the ISO 14046:2014 standard, the study examines the water footprints of three dairy production units—ice cream, yoghurt, and Ultra High Temperature (UHT) milk—focusing on identifying primary water consumption and pollution hotspots. The assessment considers both the supply chain and operational water footprints, with 48 footprints calculated based on the processing of 1L of fresh milk over 12 months in 2021. The findings reveal that ice cream production has the highest water footprint variation, followed by yoghurt and UHT milk. The study highlights the substantial contribution of green water and the importance of targeting water-intensive processes to minimize water use and wastewater generation in dairy production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in environmental engineering and green technologies book seriesSame topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207