SereniSens: a Multimodal AI Framework with LLMs for Stress Prediction through Sleep Biometrics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stress is a physiological and psychological response to threatening, challenging, or demanding situations. It can have profound effects on both mental and physical health such as anxiety and depression. Thus, managing stress levels in mental healthcare is crucial for maintaining overall well-being. In this work, we introduce SereniSens, a multimodal AI framework with conversational agent integration to predict stress levels during sleep using physiological data. We evaluated the performance of four machine learning models - Decision Tree, Support Vector Machines, Multilayer Perceptron, and XGBoost - on the SaYoPillow dataset containing physiological signals recorded during sleep. Our models achieve high accuracy in predicting fve stress levels, with SVM obtaining 99.37% accuracy, outperforming previous implementations. We also propose an architecture integrating these predictive models with a Large Language Model to create a context-aware chatbot for stress monitoring and management. This framework demonstrates the potential of AI in mental healthcare, particularly for personalized stress assessment and intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it