CHARISMATIC CHRISTIANITY: INTRODUCING ITS THEOLOGY THROUGH THE GIFTS OF THE SPIRIT. By HelenCollins. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2023. Pp. xiv + 226; appendix. Paperback, $24.99.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collins' work focuses systematically on Charismatic faith and practice, with seven key emphases (expectancy, enchantment, encounter, expression, equality, empowerment, and enjoyment), correlating with seven spiritual gifts and seven appropriate fruits, as a holistic work of the Holy Spirit in the charismatically grounded churches. With this approach, Collins uses common Pentecostal assumptions and experiences of the Spirit, drawing from the hallmark Pentecost narrative of Acts 2, to design an ordered and specific theological understanding of the oft sporadic and non-centralized, global Charismatic practice in the gifts. Her goal is to produce a work that can offer those of Charismatic tradition a means of “traditioning” others in their church, which will offer language to express with clarity their “rule of spirituality” as “the rule of doctrine.” Additionally, Charismatic Christianity has often been looked down upon for its lack of scholarship, which Collins hopes to mitigate by highlighting the profound contribution of Charismatic theology, global Christian discussion, and a need for renewal. For each chapter, Collins features one of the seven emphases, its gift, accompanied by a complementary gift, doctrinal explanation, and a fruit of the Spirit to guide its beneficial use. Collins offers a rich explanation of the topic and insight into its modern global practice. She also fairly points out potential abuses, solutions, and the necessity of developing a depth of doctrine and unity of Church, which is brought into being, empowered, and led by the Spirit. The book's orientation is more instructive and educational in focus, not popular or practical like a how-to guide. It is clearly written with Pentecostal scholars in mind who are looking for a greater application and cohesion of Charismatic expression and theology in Pentecostal scholarship, as well as pastors and lay members who want a deeper understanding of the value of Charismatic ecclesiology and practice in the everyday life, under the unity of the Spirit's work, in gifts, fruit, theology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".