MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405116693 · doi:10.3390/jcm13237433

Percutaneous Atrial Septostomy in Adult Patients on Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock: A Canadian Single-Center Experience

2024· article· en· W4405116693 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nidal El Yamani, Siddhartha Mengi, Mario Sénéchal, Éric Charbonneau, Maxime Laflamme, Julio I. Farjat‐Pasos, Josep Rodés‐Cabau, Jean-Michel Paradis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsMedicineCardiogenic shockExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationPercutaneousCardiologySingle CenterOxygenationInternal medicineSurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Patients with cardiogenic shock on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) frequently develop left ventricular (LV) distension and pulmonary edema due to an increased LV afterload. A balloon atrial septostomy (BAS) is a technique used to alleviate LV pressure and facilitate left atrial decompression. While primarily performed in pediatric populations, this procedure’s feasibility in adult patients is less studied. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes, including the safety and effectiveness, of BASs in adult patients with cardiogenic shock supported by VA-ECMO. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 11 adult patients with cardiogenic shock on VA-ECMO, who underwent a BAS between 2012 and 2023. Multiple parameters were used to evaluate the global clinical impact of a BAS on patients with cardiogenic shock. Results: Between 2012 and 2023, 11 patients with cardiogenic shock on VA-ECMO underwent a BAS procedure in our institution. The mean time from the BAS to advanced therapy was 6.4 days. Procedural success was achieved in all patients with no complications. Nine patients (82%) had an improvement in PaO2/FiO2 24 h post-BAS procedure. All patients had an improvement in the pulmonary edema on the chest X-ray 24 to 48 h after the procedure, with clear radiography achieved in nine patients (82%) in a mean time of 7 days (range: 1.5–13 days). A total of five patients (45%) had in-hospital mortality due to non-procedural complications and the mortality timing from BAS was between 5 to 23 days. Among those discharged, all six patients were alive at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: A BAS is a feasible and safe technique for decompressing the left atrium in adult patients on VA-ECMO. It significantly improved pulmonary edema and oxygenation in most cases. Further studies with larger populations are needed to evaluate its impact on long-term outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MedicineSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207