OP- 4 EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS IN LATIN AMERICA: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM ALLATIN COHORT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) may present differently depending on various factors such as ethnicity and genetic background. Latin America has a highly admixed population with a unique genetic diversity compared to other regions of the world. However, there is limited information available on the presentation and epidemiology of PBC in this region. This study aims to address the epidemiology of PBC in Latin America. Ongoing retrospective, international, multicentric cohort study sponsored by ALEH that enrolls PBC patients from different countries in Latin America. Data were accrued on 231 patients [Brazil (52%), Argentina (27.4%), Chile (10.8%), Costa Rica (4.5%), Cuba (3.6%), and Mexico (0.9%)], 92.1% female (mean age at diagnosis 50.5 years), 25.6% with cirrhosis at baseline. Overlap with autoimmune hepatitis was reported in 16.0% of cases. Most patients were symptomatic (67.9%) at diagnosis, with fatigue (41.9%) and pruritus (40.5%) being the main symptoms. Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) were positive in 70.8% and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in 60.6%. Hashimoto thyroiditis (23.7%) and Sjogren syndrome (9.1%) were the most common extrahepatic autoimmune diseases associated with PBC. Mean baseline alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and bilirubin levels were 445.9 (± 407), 89.8 (± 137.2), 37.6 (± 8.9) U/L, and 1.6 (± 3.1) mg/dL, respectively. Almost all patients (99.1%) were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). 67.4% achieved adequate response to UDCA according to the Toronto criteria and 32% normalized alkaline phosphatase at 12 months. Only 19.9% received second-line therapy, all with fibrates (89.1% bezafibrate, 8.7% ciprofibrate, 4.3% fenofibrate). Of the patients, 9% died, with 33% of deaths being liver-related, while 6% underwent liver transplantation. Hepatocellular carcinoma was diagnosed in 1.7% of patients. In this unprecedented study, the epidemiology of PBC in Latin America appears similar to that in other parts of the world. However, lower rates of AMA positivity were observed, and most patients were still diagnosed with symptomatic disease. Second-line therapy options were limited to the availability of fibrates only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".