The effect of uterine fibroid region and depth on endometrial stress and strain: a finite element approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uterine fibroids are common benign gynecological tumors that are observed in up to 80% of premenopausal women. It is understood that as the fibroid size increases, the surrounding tissues will be subject to greater loads. However, the effect of fibroid region on the uterine structure is not as clear. To better understand the mechanical loading of the endometrium due to the presence of a uterine fibroid, we developed a finite element model of the uterus to examine the effect of both fibroid depth and region in relation to the endometrium. The finite element model of the uterus, endometrium, and a uterine fibroid were created from a 3D segmentation of a patient's magnetic resonance images. This model was then loaded into ANSYS Mechanical 2023 R1, and then deformation, stress, and strain of the endometrium was measured for 24 fibroid positions (8 regions × 3 depths). The highest endometrial loads (deformation, stress, strain) were observed when the fibroid region was superior to the uterus and the depth was deep. Superior regions generated 10-20% higher loads on the endometrium in comparison to other regions, while deep locations had 5-10% higher endometrium loads when compared to superficial depths across almost all regions. A simple uterus model was used to show the effect of fibroid position on loads acting on the endometrium. This can provide insight into mechanisms of abnormal uterine bleeding and infertility and better inform clinical decision making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".