The vehicle routing problem as applied to residential solid waste collection operations: Systematic literature review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accelerated growth of cities, population increase and economic development have leveraged waste generation globally. This trend is expected to continue, with a significant increase projected in the coming years. Therefore, efficient waste management has become a crucial concern for local, national and international authorities. Transportation plays a key role in waste collection and disposal, being directly related to traffic congestion, fuel consumption and environmental pollution. Despite the existing studies on household waste collection, there is a gap in the literature regarding routing for residential waste collection in medium-sized cities, especially in emerging and frontier developing countries. Therefore, this study seeks through the science tree metaphor and PRISMA methodology, to find studies focused on the vehicle routing problem in waste collection operations, considering aspects such as Modeling approaches and solution techniques, applied Vehicle Routing Problems variants, objective functions, decision variables and constraints, applications in real environments, applied algorithms, and studies considering uncertainty and real conditions. A methodological outline of Vehicle Routing Problems in waste collection operations is presented, where central research topics are identified such as processes developed with Geographic Information System and their integration with exact methods, time windows, multi-objective capacitated vehicle routing problems, the application of stochastic models consider the uncertainty in waste collection, which has allowed including future prediction and optimization as prediction models, based on neural networks, to foresee uncertain conditions of the operations. This article analyzes the evolution in the optimization of municipal solid waste collection routes since 1964, highlighting the transition from iterative models to advanced technologies and multi-objective approaches. The importance of tools such as 3D Geographic Information System and heuristic/metaheuristic algorithms in improving planning and efficiency, despite limitations in the face of uncertainty, is emphasized. The systematic review shows a trend towards sustainable and efficient solutions, indicating future directions for research in urban waste management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".