MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405125875 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114545

LiDAR-derived Lorenz-entropy metric for vertical structural complexity: A comparative study of tropical dry and moist forests

2024· article· en· W4405125875 on OpenAlexafffund
Nooshin Mashhadi, Arturo Sánchez‐Azofeifa, Rubén Valbuena

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing of Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSveriges LantbruksuniversitetUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsLidarRemote sensingMetric (unit)Tropical forestEntropy (arrow of time)Environmental scienceGeographyMathematicsPhysicsEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces an Entropy-based index: the Lorenz-entropy (LE) index, which we have developed by integrating Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR), econometrics, and forest ecology. The main goal of the LE is to bridge the gap between theoretical entropy concepts and their practical applications in monitoring vertical structural complexity of tropical forest ecosystems. The LE index quantifies entropy by analyzing Relative Height (RH) metrics (representing a one-dimensional (1D) canopy structure metric) distributions from full-waveform LiDAR across successional stages in a tropical dry forest (TDF) and a tropical rainforest. To validate the LE trends derived from LiDAR, we extended the analysis using inventory-based two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) metrics, specifically basal area and biomass. The consistency of trends between the 1D LiDAR-derived LE and the inventory-based 2D and 3D metrics reinforces the LE's ability to capture and monitor structural complexity reliably across different measurement dimensions. Our findings demonstrated that LE captures the changes in entropy as a function of successional stages, reflecting how canopy structure evolves towards homogeneity and complexity. Our statistical analysis revealed significant differences between successional stages (ANOVA, α = 0.05, p < 2e-16), with LE increasing substantially from early to late stages and plateauing at climax, where vertical structure (entropy) stabilizes. The mean LE increased by 1.70 × 10 − 2 between late and climax stages, with a small effect size (Cohen's d = 0.25), indicating minor differences in complexity. The LE index, calculated from biomass and basal area, confirming that as forests mature, entropy and vertical structural complexity increase. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis showed that LE is most responsive to RHs variability during intermediate stages, suggesting that structural development is most dynamic during this phase. These results demonstrate the potential of the LE index as a tool for ecological analysis and monitoring forest dynamics. • Introducing the Lorenz-Entropy (LE) index integrating LiDAR, and econometrics. • The LE index links entropy theory with practical forest monitoring applications. • The LE index quantifies entropy in diverse tropical forest ecosystems. • The LE from waveform LiDAR reveals structural diversity trends in tropical forests. • Empirical analysis validates the LE with canopy height, basal area, and biomass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote Sensing of EnvironmentSame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207