MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405142761 · doi:10.1002/its2.171

Cross‐resistance of <i>Clarireedia jacksonii</i> to demethylation‐inhibiting fungicides

2024· article· en· W4405142761 on OpenAlex
Andrea Rether, Kangfu Yu, Tom Hsiang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Turfgrass Society research journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFungicideDemethylationCross-resistanceResistance (ecology)BiologyChemistryHorticultureMicrobiologyAgronomyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dollar spot, caused by Clarireedia jacksonii Salgado, is the most common turf disease in Eastern North America. It is often managed by repeat applications of demethylation‐inhibiting (DMI) fungicides, and decreased sensitivity to the DMI, propiconazole, has been reported. Cross‐resistance, where an organism shows resistance to multiple pesticides, was evaluated in lab studies for C. jacksonii starting almost 30 years ago with four DMI fungicides available at that time. The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity among 20 isolates of C. jacksonii (low‐to‐high resistance) to 12 DMI fungicides. EC 50 values (effective concentration for 50% inhibition of hyphal growth) were generated for each fungicide by isolate combination, and log 10 transformations of these values were subjected to pairwise correlation analysis, giving R ‐values ranging from 0.60 to 0.99 (all p ≤ 0.05). This suggested that there is significant cross‐resistance in C. jacksonii among the 12 DMI fungicides tested, ranging from partial (mefentrifluconazole and epoxiconazole) to almost complete.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it