MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405146833 · doi:10.59535/es.v2i2.336

Differences in Academic Saturation Levels of Students at National Senior High Schools in Malang Based on Gender

2024· article· en· W4405146833 on OpenAlexaff
Nofira Rina Cahyani, Victoria Luong, Soram Goutam

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation Specialist · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatisticCluster samplingSMA*PsychologyAffect (linguistics)Significant differenceMultistage samplingMathematics educationStatisticsMathematicsDemographySociologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to determine the differences in academic saturation levels of SMA Nasional Malang students based on gender. This study uses a comparative descriptive design with a quantitative approach. This study used 196 respondents obtained through a cluster random sampling technique. The data collected were inventory and analyzed using the hypothesis test (t). Based on the results of the analysis, it is known that the t statistic value obtained was 1.313 and the p value (P-value) obtained was 0.180. It can be concluded that there is no significant difference between male and female gender on academic saturation of SMA Nasional students. This means that gender does not affect the level of academic saturation of students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducation SpecialistSame topicMathematics Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207