MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405146833 · doi:10.59535/es.v2i2.336

Differences in Academic Saturation Levels of Students at National Senior High Schools in Malang Based on Gender

2024· article· en· W4405146833 on OpenAlexaff
Nofira Rina Cahyani, Victoria Luong, Soram Goutam

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation Specialist · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatisticCluster samplingSMA*PsychologyAffect (linguistics)Significant differenceMultistage samplingMathematics educationStatisticsMathematicsDemographySociologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to determine the differences in academic saturation levels of SMA Nasional Malang students based on gender. This study uses a comparative descriptive design with a quantitative approach. This study used 196 respondents obtained through a cluster random sampling technique. The data collected were inventory and analyzed using the hypothesis test (t). Based on the results of the analysis, it is known that the t statistic value obtained was 1.313 and the p value (P-value) obtained was 0.180. It can be concluded that there is no significant difference between male and female gender on academic saturation of SMA Nasional students. This means that gender does not affect the level of academic saturation of students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducation SpecialistSame topicMathematics Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207