MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405160557 · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100704

Leveraging satellite data for greenhouse gas mitigation in Canadian poultry farming

2024· article· en· W4405160557 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Bubacarr Jobarteh, Suresh Neethirajan

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Agricultural Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsMinnesota Department of Agriculture
KeywordsGreenhouse gasSatelliteAgricultureGreenhouseEnvironmental scienceAgricultural scienceBusinessGeographyAgronomyEngineeringBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

■ Satellite data and machine learning predict methane and CO₂ emissions in poultry farming. ■ ARIMA, LSTM, and XGBoost models reveal emission trends across 1300 Canadian poultry farms. ■ Regional and seasonal variability in emissions is driven by climate and farm practices. ■ Ontario leads methane emissions in Canadian poultry farms, driven by large-scale operations. ■ Methane emissions peak in summer, with farms emitting 67% more than processors annually. Accurate monitoring of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from poultry farms is essential for effective climate change mitigation. This study integrates satellite imagery with advanced machine learning techniques to analyze methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from over 1,300 poultry farms and processors across Canada from 2019 to 2023. Utilizing high-resolution atmospheric data from Sentinel-5P and NASA's OCO-2 satellites, emissions were systematically mapped both temporally and spatially. We employed Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models to forecast emission trends and identify primary emission drivers. The LSTM model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy, achieving the lowest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values of 10 for CH₄ and 362 for CO₂. Our analysis reveals significant regional and seasonal variability in emissions, influenced by climatic conditions and operational practices. Additionally, benchmarking of emissions data was conducted to establish performance standards and monitor progress towards reduction targets. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders, facilitating the development of targeted emission reduction strategies that align with regulatory standards and promote environmental sustainability. By combining state-of-the-art data analytics with satellite-based monitoring, this research enhances the precision and efficiency of GHG tracking in the Canadian poultry sector. Furthermore, it establishes a robust framework for formulating effective climate change mitigation strategies, thereby supporting Canada's broader environmental objectives and advancing sustainable agricultural practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmart Agricultural TechnologySame topicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207