MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405172135 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad9c11

AsterX: a new open-source GPU-accelerated GRMHD code for dynamical spacetimes

2024· article· en· W4405172135 on OpenAlexaff
Jay Vijay Kalinani, Li-Wei Ji, Lorenzo Ennoggi, Federico G. Lopez Armengol, Lucas Timotheo Sanches, Bing-Jyun Tsao, Steven R. Brandt, Manuela Campanelli, R. Ciolfi, Bruno Giacomazzo, Roland Haas, Erik Schnetter, Yosef Zlochower

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersEuropean CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsSpacetimeComputational scienceDiscretizationSupercomputerModular designScalingMagnetohydrodynamic driveMassively parallelWarp driveCode (set theory)Adaptive mesh refinementParallel computingComputer scienceMagnetohydrodynamicsTheoretical physicsGeometryProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present AsterX , a novel open-source, modular, GPU-accelerated, fully general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) code designed for dynamic spacetimes in 3D Cartesian coordinates, and tailored for exascale computing. We utilize block-structured adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) through CarpetX , the new driver for the Einstein Toolkit , which is built on AMReX , a software framework for massively parallel applications. AsterX employs the Valencia formulation for GRMHD, coupled with the ‘Z4c’ formalism for spacetime evolution, while incorporating high resolution shock capturing schemes to accurately handle the hydrodynamics. AsterX has undergone rigorous testing in both static and dynamic spacetime, demonstrating remarkable accuracy and agreement with other codes in literature. Using subcycling in time, we find an overall performance gain of factor 2.5–4.5. Benchmarking the code through scaling tests on OLCF’s Frontier supercomputer, we demonstrate a weak scaling efficiency of about 67%–77% on 4096 nodes compared to an 8-node performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical and Quantum GravitySame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207