Heat transport in crystalline organic semiconductors: coexistence of phonon propagation and tunneling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding heat transport in organic semiconductors is of fundamental and practical relevance. Therefore, we study the lattice thermal conductivities of a series of (oligo)acenes, where an increasing number of rings per molecule leads to a systematic increase of the crystals' complexity. Temperature-dependent thermal conductivity experiments in these systems disagree with predictions based on the traditional Peierls-Boltzmann framework, which describes heat transport in terms of particle-like phonon propagation. We demonstrate that accounting for additional phonon-tunneling conduction mechanisms through the Wigner Transport Equation resolves this disagreement and quantitatively rationalizes experiments. The pronounced increase of tunneling transport with temperature explains several unusual experimental observations, such as a weak temperature dependence in naphthalene's conductivity and an essentially temperature-invariant conductivity in pentacene. While the anisotropic conductivities within the acene planes are essentially material-independent, the tunneling contributions (and hence the total conductivities) significantly increase with molecular length in the molecular backbone direction, which for pentacene results in a surprising minimum of the thermal conductivity at 300K.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".