MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405178322 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452151

CHEOPS observations confirm nodal precession in the WASP-33 system

2024· article· en· W4405178322 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. M. S. Smith, Sz. Csizmadia, V. Van Grootel, M. Lendl, C. M. Persson, G. Olofsson, D. Ehrenreich, Maximilian N. Günther, A. Heitzmann, S. C. C. Barros, A. Bonfanti, A. Brandeker, J. Cabrera, O. D. S. Demangeon, L. Fossati, Jan‐Vincent Harre, M. J. Hooton, S. Hoyer, Szilárd Kálmán, Sébastien Salmon, S. G. Sousa, Gyula M. Szabó, T. G. Wilson, Y. Alibert, R. Alonso, J. Asquier, T. Bárczy, D. Barrado, W. Baumjohann, W. Benz, N. Billot, L. Borsato, C. Broeg, A. Collier Cameron, A. C. M. Correia, P. E. Cubillos, M. B. Davies, M. Deleuil, A. Deline, Brice-Olivier Demory, A. Derekas, Billy Edwards, J. A. Egger, A. Erikson, A. Fortier, M. Fridlund, D. Gandolfi, K. Gazeas, M. Gillon, M. Güdel, J. Hasiba, Ch. Helling, K. G. Isaak, L. L. Kiss, J. Korth, K. W. F. Lam, J. Laskar, A. Lecavelier des Étangs, Demetrio Magrin, P. F. L. Maxted, B. Merín, C. Mordasini, V. Nascimbeni, R. Ottensamer, I. Pagano, Ε. Πάλλη, G. Peter, D. Piazza, G. Piotto, D. Pollacco, D. Queloz, Roberto Ragazzoni, N. Rando, H. Rauer, I. Ribas, N. C. Santos, G. Scandariato, D. Ségransan, A. E. Simon, M. Stalport, S. Sulis, S. Udry, Soléne Ulmer-Moll, J. Venturini, E. Villaver, Valentina Viotto, Ingo Walter, N. A. Walton, Sebastián Wolf

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundStaatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und InnovationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesFondazione CRTEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónUniversité de GenèveGeneralitat de CatalunyaFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtUK Space AgencyAustrian Science FundSwedish National Space AgencyCanadian Celiac AssociationAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversity of WarwickCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Science FoundationEuropean Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsPrecessionAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims . We aim to observe the transits and occultations of WASP-33 b, which orbits a rapidly rotating δ Scuti pulsator, with the goal of measuring the orbital obliquity via the gravity-darkening effect, and constraining the geometric albedo via the occultation depth. Methods . We observed four transits and four occultations with CHEOPS, and employ a variety of techniques to remove the effects of the stellar pulsations from the light curves, as well as the usual CHEOPS systematic effects. We also performed a comprehensive analysis of low-resolution spectral and Gaia data to re-determine the stellar properties of WASP-33. Results . We measure an orbital obliquity 111.3 −0.7 +0.2 degrees, which is consistent with previous measurements made via Doppler tomography. We also measure the planetary impact parameter, and confirm that this parameter is undergoing rapid secular evolution as a result of nodal precession of the planetary orbit. This precession allows us to determine the second-order fluid Love number of the star, which we find agrees well with the predictions of theoretical stellar models. We are unable to robustly measure a unique value of the occultation depth, and emphasise the need for long-baseline observations to better measure the pulsation periods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207