MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405178930 · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2024.3514217

Enhanced Fronthaul Capacity in CRANs: Sum-Rate Maximization via Joint Optimal Design of STAR-RIS, Massive MIMO and Data Compression

2024· article· en· W4405178930 on OpenAlexafffund
Iqra Farhat, Umar Rashid, Omer Waqar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMIMOJoint (building)MaximizationComputer scienceMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematical optimizationStructural engineeringBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud Radio Access Networks (CRAN) face a critical challenge due to the limited capacity of fronthaul links overwhelmed by massive data transmissions. This paper proposes a novel CRAN design that effectively tackles this challenge. Our approach combines three key elements: (1) Massive MIMO at the baseband unit to leverage large array gain and interference suppression; (2) a novel simultaneous transmitting and reflecting (STAR) reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) that can both transmit and reflect signals concurrently, improving fronthaul capacity through energy splitting technique by enabling communication with remote radio heads serving multiple user equipments; and (3) a data compression technique by optimizing the quantization noise covariance matrix across remote radio heads, significantly reducing the fronthaul traffic load. We formulate a problem to maximize the overall network sum-rate by jointly optimizing transmit power, fronthaul capacity, beamforming vectors at RRHs, data compression, and STAR-RIS transmission-reflection coefficients. To address the nonconvexity of the resulting joint optimization problem, successive convexification along with alternating optimization technique are used to develop an iterative algorithm. Simulations demonstrate that our STAR-RIS-aided CRAN design surpasses conventional reflecting-only RIS aided CRAN by providing full-space coverage and thus offering more degrees-of-freedom compared to traditional RIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Vehicular TechnologySame topicTelecommunications and Broadcasting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207