A Multi-Modal System Featuring Wireless Flexible Sensor Patches and a Depth-Sensing Imager for Home-Based Monitoring of Rehabilitation Exercises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring rehabilitation progress at home over the long term following a spinal cord injury (SCI) is crucial for maximizing therapeutic outcomes and enhancing the quality of life of affected individuals. Comprehensive monitoring requires collecting a range of physiological data, including surface electromyography (sEMG) and exercise motion data. Currently, assessments typically take place in clinical settings, which can be both costly and inconvenient for patients. There is a lack of accessible, user-friendly systems that allow individuals with SCI to independently gather this data at home. Additionally, video recordings may be necessary to verify that patients are positioning the sensors correctly and performing the exercises accurately. To bridge this gap, we have developed a self-contained, multi-modal sensor system that captures sEMG and motion data, along with depth-sensing video to track patient exercises while ensuring privacy by minimizing identifiable details. The system includes a configurable number of wireless, multi-sensor wearable patches that are easy to attach and comfortable for extended use, along with a time-of-flight depth-sensing camera. The multi-modal data is streamed and synchronized in real-time on a Raspberry Pi, establishing an innovative platform to support SCI rehabilitation and adaptable for various clinical monitoring applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".