NCPepFold: Accurate Prediction of Non-canonical Cyclic Peptide Structures via Cyclization Optimization with Multigranular Representation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Artificial intelligence-based peptide structure prediction methods have revolutionized biomolecular science. However, restricting predictions to peptides composed solely of 20 natural amino acids significantly limits their practical application, as such peptides often demonstrate poor stability under physiological conditions. Here, we present NCPepFold, a computational approach that can utilize a specific cyclic position matrix to directly predict the structure of cyclic peptides with non-canonical amino acids. By integrating multi-granularity information at the residue- and atomic-level, along with fine-tuning techniques, NCPepFold significantly improves prediction accuracy, with the average peptide RMSD for cyclic peptides being 1.640 Å. In summary, this is a novel deep learning model designed specifically for cyclic peptides with non-canonical amino acids without length restrictions, offering great potential for peptide drug design and advancing biomedical research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".