Uncovering the signaling networks of disseminated glioblastoma cells <i>in vivo</i> with INSIGHT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Dysregulation of intracellular signaling networks underpins cancer. However, a systems-level elucidation of how signaling networks within distinct cell subpopulations drive cancer progression in vivo has been unattainable due to technical limitations. We developed INSIGHT (INvestigating SIGnaling network of specific cell subpopulation in Heterogeneous Tissue), a new platform technology combining fluorescence-activated cell sorting with ultra-sensitive mass spectrometry to enable phosphoproteomic characterization of rare and discrete cell subpopulations from fixed tissues. We demonstrated the broad utility of INSIGHT by analyzing the oligodendroglial cell-specific signaling network in the mouse brain. We then applied INSIGHT to investigate the rare, disseminated tumor cell subpopulation in glioblastoma patient-derived xenograft models. INSIGHT uncovered a global rewiring of signaling networks with tumor cell dissemination, marked by a transition from proliferation-associated signaling in the primary tumor cells to signaling associated with postsynapse, neuronal migration, and ion homeostasis in disseminated tumor cells. We reveal interconnections between signaling circuitries within the networks, with numerous proteins, including GluA2, exhibiting altered phosphorylation without protein expression changes, emphasizing the role of post-translational modifications in glioblastoma dissemination. We validated key phosphorylation changes and inferred differentially active kinases with tumor spread to offer new systems-level insights into glioblastoma dissemination mechanisms in vivo . INSIGHT is generally applicable to a wide range of biological systems without genetic engineering and provides quantitative phosphorylation and protein expression data for selected cell subpopulations from heterogeneous tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".