MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Axisymmetric internal wave tunneling

2024· article· en· W4405185532 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Fluids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsRotational symmetryInternal waveQuantum tunnellingAmplitudeCartesian coordinate systemPhysicsStratification (seeds)Context (archaeology)MechanicsStratified flowsClassical mechanicsGeologyStratified flowGeometryOpticsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Though internal waves cannot propagate vertically through weakly stratified fluid, if the depth of the weak stratification is sufficiently shallow, these waves can partially transmit through it. This paper quantitatively extends previous results on Cartesian internal wave tunneling to the case of axisymmetric wave fields and proposes a simple three-layer model. We show that there exists a smooth transition between the fully propagating and the tunneling regimes. We further reflect on the challenges set by the measurement of internal wave mode amplitudes in confined domains, and we discuss an innovative method to measure said amplitudes in this experimental and numerical context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it