MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405185931 · doi:10.3390/rs16234599

Arctic Sea Ice Surface Temperature Retrieval from FengYun-3A MERSI-I Data

2024· article· en· W4405185931 on OpenAlexaff
Yachao Li, Tingting Liu, Zemin Wang, Mohammed Shokr, Menglin Yuan, Qiangqiang Yuan, Shiyu Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSea iceThe arcticEnvironmental scienceArcticClimatologyOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arctic sea-ice surface temperature (IST) is an important environmental and climatic parameter. Currently, wide-swath sea-ice surface temperature products have a spatial resolution of approximately 1000 m. The Medium Resolution Spectral Imager (MERSI-I) offers a thermal infrared channel with a wide-swath width of 2900 km and a high spatial resolution of 250 m. In this study, we developed an applicable single-channel algorithm to retrieve ISTs from MERSI-I data. The algorithm accounts for the following challenges: (1) the wide range of incidence angle; (2) the unstable snow-covered ice surface; (3) the variation in atmospheric water vapor content; and (4) the unique spectral response function of MERSI-I. We reduced the impact of using a constant emissivity on the IST retrieval accuracy by simulating the directional emissivity. Different ice surface types were used in the simulation, and we recommend the sun crust type as the most suitable for IST retrieval. We estimated the real-time water vapor content using a band ratio method from the MERSI-I near-infrared data. The results show that the retrieved IST was lower than the buoy measurements, with a mean bias and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of −1.928 K and 2.616 K. The retrieved IST is higher than the IceBridge measurements, with a mean bias and RMSE of 1.056 K and 1.760 K. Compared with the original algorithm, the developed algorithm has higher accuracy and reliability. The sensitivity analysis shows that the atmospheric water vapor content with an error of 20% may lead to an IST retrieval error of less than 1.01 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207