Le droit animalier québécois : vers un agenda de recherche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours des dernières années, le traitement des animaux a retenu une attention sans précédent au Québec et le droit animalier a subi des transformations profondes. Ce champ de recherche en pleine ébullition méritait un pôle de recherche universitaire québécois. L’Observatoire québécois de droit animalier a pour mandat la promotion, l’étude et le développement du droit animalier. Ses activités, organisées autour de trois axes principaux – recherche, éducation et innovation sociale –, visent à combler les lacunes actuelles et à proposer des solutions innovantes pour améliorer la condition animale en droit. Cette note de recherche constitue un premier jalon essentiel dans cette mission, offrant un état de la situation du droit animalier québécois et établissant les bases d’un agenda de recherche auquel sont convié·es juristes et philosophes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".