MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405200370 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-bz4cj

The First Quaternary Bismuthide Zintl Phase Ba8Zn2-xIn3+xBi10 with complex Crystal Structure

2024· preprint· en· W4405200370 on OpenAlexaff
Siméon Ponou, Daniel Grüner, Holger Kleinke, Anja‐Verena Mudring

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyTetrahedronZintl phaseMonoclinic crystal systemCrystal structureValence (chemistry)Atom (system on chip)Group (periodic table)ChemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first quaternary Zintl phase Ba8Zn2–xIn3+xBi10 (x = 0.21–0.47) was synthesized by reacting the elements at high temperature and, its crystal structure determined from single crystal X-ray diffraction data. It crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/m, with a large unit cell volume, V = 3351.3(6) Å3 (Z = 4), which is a new structure type. The basic structural building blocks are MBi4 tetrahedra (M = In or Zn/In mix) that are condensed by sharing corners when mainly centered by In atom, or corners and edges when mainly centered by Zn atom. In turn, these tetrahedra form two markedly distinct one-dimensional (1-D) polyanionic substructures, defining two virtually distinct sub-structures. Corollary, the title structure can be viewed as an intergrowth of two imaginary quaternary phases (1A) “Ba3Zn1–yIn1+yBi4” and (1B) “Ba5Zn1–zIn2+zBi6” (with x = y+z). The polyanionic system in the 1A block, [Zn1–yIn1+yBi4]6– consists of dimeric pentagonal rings that are stacked to form double pentagonal tubes running in the b-direction, and filled with Ba cations. The polyanion in the 1B block, [Zn1–zIn2+zBi6]6– consists of large ribbons formed by the condensation of two strands of dimeric corner sharing infinite chains of [InBi4] tetrahedra with one chain of edge-sharing [ZnBi4] tetrahedra. The Zn/In atomic site preferences appeared to be one decisive factor behind the structural complexity and, it seems to be directed mainly by the atomic valence states and sizes, as well as the electrostatic factors, aiming to optimize the lattice reticular energy, as confirmed by total energy calculations on three ordered models using DFT methods. According to the Zintl-Klemm concept (ZKC) and the 8–N rules, the compound should be charge balanced for x = 0. Therefore, the experimentally observed phase width (x = 0.21 to 0.47) indicates that the system is amenable for substantial (n- or p-type) doping, to fine tune their transport properties, like the charge carrier concentration and charge mobility, via specific chemical substitutions at specific sites of the two polyanionic blocks. The DFT electronic band structure calculations on the hypothetical fully ordered model ‘Ba8Zn2In3Bi10’ (x = 0), also predicted the title compound to be a semiconductor with narrow band gap. Therefore, the title phase fully qualified as a promising thermoelectric material candidate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207