Raconter la chasse. Territoire et communauté dans La foi du braconnier (2009) de Marc Séguin et La bête lumineuse (1982) de Pierre Perrault
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La chasse et la narration sont des activités qui remontent aux origines de l’humanité. Ainsi, on retrouve des récits de chasse aussi loin que la documentation archéologique nous permet de remonter. Or, il est important de souligner que la chasse, dans les arts narratifs, servait souvent à raconter autre chose que la chasse elle-même. La portée symbolique de ses composantes, sa dimension métaphorique, son rapport à l’animal et à la nature ont contribué, au fil des époques, à la structuration de différents discours, qu’ils soient cosmologiques, hiérarchiques ou critiques. À partir de ce puissant maillage historique, cet article vise à cerner comment le roman La foi du braconnier (2009) de Marc Séguin et le long métrage La bête lumineuse (1982) de Pierre Perrault mobilisent la thématique cynégétique, profondément inscrite dans la tradition, afin de mettre en scène différentes problématiques contemporaines, notamment par rapport au territoire et à la communauté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".