Les souvenirs de voyage de Jeanne Bellonie Bourdaret : l’écriture féminine et l’exploration de l’Orient à la fin du dix-neuvième siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Publiés par la Librairie Hachette, les récits de voyage de Jeanne Bellonie Bourdaret – À travers l’Arménie russe (1891 ; 1892), En Asie mineure, souvenirs de voyages en Cappadoce (1896) et En Asie mineure : Cilicie (1898) – forment un contraste avec ceux rédigés par le savant Ernest Chantre à la suite de leur expédition commune au Caucase, en Cappadoce et en Cilicie. L’article examine l’espace narratif de l’écriture de voyage au féminin, espace considéré à l’époque comme subalterne et secondaire, et s’interroge sur les raisons qui expliquent l’un des paradoxes produit par la postérité sur la valeur accordée aux récits des couples voyageurs du dix-neuvième siècle, soit l’intérêt grandissant pour les écrits dits féminins et le discrédit que connaissent de nos jours de nombreuses théories produites par les érudits férus de craniologie à une époque où l’impérialisme européen connait son apogée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".