MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405209224 · doi:10.1080/17480930.2024.2437737

Automated open-stope design optimization through machine learning methods

2024· article· en· W4405209224 on OpenAlexaff
Nelson Morales, Aldo Quelopana

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPillarPrincipal component analysisIdentification (biology)Computer scienceComponent (thermodynamics)EngineeringData miningEngineering drawingArtificial intelligenceStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research innovates in open-stope mine layout optimisation, transitioning from traditional manual identification of ore veins to an automated approach based on DBSCAN and Principal Component Analysis. Paired with an optimisation model for stopes determination, this method streamlines the layout design and ensures efficient and precise configurations under specific constraints, such as stope and pillar sizes. Validation across five diverse, realistic instances demonstrated noteworthy accuracy and efficiency, revealing an average deviation of −0.6% and −0.1% for strike and dip angles, respectively, and processing 10 million blocks in under a minute.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mining Reclamation and EnvironmentSame topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207