MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405215004 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1505427

Influence of maternal nutrition and one-carbon metabolites supplementation on bovine antimicrobial peptides in fetal and maternal tissues

2024· article· en· W4405215004 on OpenAlexaff
Mojtaba Daneshi, Pawel P. Borowicz, Mara R Hirchert, Yssi L Entzie, Jessica G Syring, Layla E King, Kazi Sarjana Safain, Muhammad Anas, Lawrence P. Reynolds, Alison K Ward, Carl R Dahlen, Matthew S Crouse, Joel S Caton

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsBiologyFetusOffspringEstrous cycleGestationPassive immunityInternal medicineEndocrinologyAndrologyPregnancyImmune systemImmunityImmunologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Maternal nutrition during pregnancy critically influences offspring development and immune function. One-carbon metabolites (OCM) are epigenetic modifiers that may modulate antimicrobial peptide (AMP) expression, which is vital for innate immunity. This study investigated the effects of maternal nutrient restriction and OCM supplementation on mRNA expression of AMP in fetal and maternal lung, mammary gland, and small intestine of beef cattle. Methods Twenty-nine crossbred Angus beef heifers were synchronized for estrus and artificially inseminated. They were assigned to one of four treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial design: nutritional plane [control (CON) vs. restricted (RES)] and OCM supplementation [without OCM (−OCM) or with OCM (+OCM)]. Heifers on the CON diet were fed to gain 0.45 kg/day, while RES heifers were fed to lose 0.23 kg/day. Treatments were applied from day 0 to 63 of gestation, after which all heifers were fed a common diet to gain 0.45 kg/day until day 161 of gestation, when samples were collected. Quantitative RT-qPCR was used to assess mRNA expression of AMP. Results Nutritional plane had no effect ( p ≥ 0.24) on mRNA expression of AMP in either the fetus or dams. However, the mRNA expression of cathelicidin5 ( CATHL5 ; p = 0.07) and bovine neutrophil β-defensin5 (BNBD5; p = 0.07) in the fetal lung and mammary gland, respectively, was lower in the +OCM groups compared to the −OCM groups. In the maternal small intestine, the expression of enteric β-defensin (EBD) was lower ( p = 0.01) in the +OCM groups compared to the −OCM groups. Additionally, in the maternal lung, there was a tendency ( p = 0.06) for an interaction in CATHL5 mRNA expression, with the RES + OCM group showing greater expression compared to the CON + OCM ( p = 0.07) and RES − OCM ( p = 0.08) groups. Discussion Our findings suggest that while restricted maternal nutrition did not affect mRNA expression of AMP, OCM supplementation modulated AMP expression in both fetal and maternal tissues. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying OCM’s impact on AMP expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207