Extra-axial inflammatory signal and its relationship to peripheral and central immunity in depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although both central and peripheral inflammation have been observed consistently in depression, the relationship between the two remains obscure. Extra-axial immune cells may play a role in mediating the connection between central and peripheral immunity. This study investigates the potential roles of calvarial bone marrow and parameningeal spaces in mediating interactions between central and peripheral immunity in depression. PET was used to measure regional TSPO expression in the skull and parameninges as a marker of inflammatory activity. This measure was correlated with brain TSPO expression and peripheral cytokine concentrations in a cohort enriched for heightened peripheral and central immunity comprising 51 individuals with depression and 25 healthy controls. The findings reveal a complex relationship between regional skull TSPO expression and both peripheral and central immunity. Facial and parietal skull bone TSPO expression showed significant associations with both peripheral and central immunity. TSPO expression in the confluence of sinuses was also linked to both central and peripheral immune markers. Group-dependent elevations in TSPO expression within the occipital skull bone marrow were also found to be significantly associated with central inflammation. Significant associations between immune activity within the skull, parameninges, parenchyma and periphery highlight the role of the skull bone marrow and venous sinuses as pivotal sites for peripheral and central immune interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".