Neurovascular complications of antiphospholipid syndrome: a narrative review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by thrombosis, pregnancy complications, and other nonthrombotic manifestations in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Neurovascular complications, including ischemic stroke, cerebral venous thrombosis and cognitive impairment, pose significant challenges in management. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively review relevant and updated clinical aspects of neurovascular manifestations of APS. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases with medical terms related to APS and its neurovascular manifestations. English-language studies, published between January 1, 2015, and March 2024, were included. Key publications outside this timeframe were also considered. Studies with higher levels of evidence, such as randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, were prioritized for inclusion. RESULTS: Stroke is a prevalent complication in APS, with arterial thrombosis being a predominant mechanism. Despite recent trials, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have not shown superiority over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for secondary prevention in this population. Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), although rare, can also occur in APS, and while DOACs have shown promise as a treatment in a general population, caution is warranted due to potential harm. Cognitive impairment affects a considerable proportion of APS patients, with thrombotic and nonthrombotic mechanisms contributing to its pathophysiology. Future research should focus on optimal management strategies for cognitive impairment and the efficacy of anticoagulation and immunosuppression. CONCLUSION: Understanding the complex interplay of neurovascular manifestations in APS is essential for guiding clinical decisions and improving patient outcomes. Despite advancements, some challenges remain in establishing effective preventive and treatment measures, highlighting the need for further research in this field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".