MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405220907 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2024-260625

Scorpion sting-induced malignant middle cerebral artery infarction

2024· article· en· W4405220907 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaya Vigneish Thangavelu, Binila Chacko

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVenomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScorpionStingMedicineCardiologyMiddle cerebral arteryInfarctionInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionIschemiaBiologyVenomEngineeringFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A previously healthy middle-aged man in his 40s with a history of red scorpion envenomation presented to the emergency department for the management of an acute stroke syndrome, involving the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory, that developed 12 hours after the scorpion sting. He presented to the hospital 15 hours following the stroke. The activation of the autonomic nervous system by the Indian red scorpion venom is known to produce severe systemic manifestations, including cardiogenic shock and acute pulmonary oedema. Death is a rare consequence. Neurological complications resulting from red scorpion injuries are exceedingly uncommon and inadequately documented in the literature. The patient underwent an emergency decompressive craniectomy in view of neurological deterioration despite intracranial pressure-reducing agents. Thrombectomy could not be done in view of the malignant infarct (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score of 1) which involved over one-third of the MCA territory. Our patient has made a full recovery and at 6 months' follow-up; he was capable of walking without assistance. It is essential to promptly identify and manage this under-recognised presentation in order to yield favourable functional outcomes for the patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicVenomous Animal Envenomation and StudiesFrench-language works237,207