MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405221318 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdae167.115

(117) RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF POST-SURGICAL ORCHALGIA IN MEN UNDERGOING NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY

2024· article· en· W4405221318 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMale Reproductive Health Studies
Canadian institutionsManitoba HealthUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasectomyMedicineVasectomy reversalRetrospective cohort studyGeneral surgerySurgeryGynecologyFamily planningResearch methodologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Vasectomy is a form of permanent contraception in men that is safe, effective, and widely utilized. While complications are relatively uncommon, patients may experience post-vasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS) postsurgically. Current literature quotes a broad range in the incidence of chronic orchalgia following no-scalpel vasectomy from 0.6% - 26%. Chronic scrotal pain associated with a negative impact on quality of life, occurs after vasectomy in about 1-2% of men. Current guidelines state that few of these men require additional surgery, but there is scarce data on the actual proportion of men who will go on to receive surgical treatment for pain. Objective We sought to evaluate our incidence of post vasectomy pain as well as the rate of surgical management of post vasectomy pain with the objective of better counselling patients on the risks of vasectomy and subsequent surgeries. Methods A chart review was performed for all men who underwent a vasectomy at the Men's Health Clinic during a 20-month period. Their baseline characteristics were collected including age, previous scrotal surgery and history of orchalgia. The presence of pain or complications was collected at a 3 month follow up appointment. Patients with pain were then followed every 6-8 weeks for continued management. Results A total of 350 men underwent elective no scalpel vasectomy during this period, with a median age of 37. The majority of patients had no previous history of orchalgia (98%), or history of previous scrotal surgery (94%) and there was no association between these variables on post vasectomy pain. At 3 months post vasectomy, 38/350 (11%) of patients had ongoing pain, while 89% did not report post-operative issues or pain. There was no statistical difference in age between both groups. Semen analysis was only completed by 227/350 (65%) of patients, with 96% of those patients azoospermic. One patient has required surgery (epididymectomy) for management of post vasectomy pain 3 months following vasectomy and now has complete resolution of his pain. Conclusions Our retrospective analysis of 350 men who underwent no scalpel vasectomy shows a significant proportion of post vasectomy pain of some degree at the 3-month follow-up appointment, although most cases are resolving or minor and only one patient has required surgical management. This data highlights the importance of counselling men undergoing vasectomy regarding the risks of post procedure orchalgia and the small proportion of men who will require additional surgical intervention. Disclosure No.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it