Accurate quantification of nascent and mature RNAs from single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), the coexistence of nascent (unprocessed) and mature (processed) messenger RNA (mRNA) poses challenges in accurate read mapping and the interpretation of count matrices. The traditional transcriptome reference, defining the "region of interest" in bulk RNA-seq, restricts its focus to mature mRNA transcripts. This restriction leads to two problems: reads originating outside of the "region of interest" are prone to mismapping within this region, and additionally, such external reads cannot be matched to specific transcript targets. Expanding the "region of interest" to encompass both nascent and mature mRNA transcript targets provides a more comprehensive framework for RNA-seq analysis. Here, we introduce the concept of distinguishing flanking k-mers (DFKs) to improve mapping of sequencing reads. We have developed an algorithm to identify DFKs, which serve as a sophisticated "background filter", enhancing the accuracy of mRNA quantification. This dual strategy of an expanded region of interest coupled with the use of DFKs enhances the precision in quantifying both mature and nascent mRNA molecules, as well as in delineating reads of ambiguous status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".