MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405225403 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdae161.075

(093) DESCRIPTION OF SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC, PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL AND PAIN’S PRESENCE AND INTENSITY OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN A REFERRAL PSYCHIATRIC-MEDICAL CENTER SAMPLE: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

2024· article· en· W4405225403 on OpenAlexaff
CH Yui, IVV Nisida, MDT Scanavino

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychopathologyPsychiatryReferralSexual abuseClinical psychologyMedicineSample (material)PsychologyPoison controlInjury preventionFamily medicineMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Despite extensive evidence between sexual violence trauma and chronic pain, there is lack of studies investigating its interaction from a psychosomatic-physical perspective. This study investigates physical and psychopathological interactions in sexual violence victims. Objective Describe the sociodemographic aspects, adverse childhood experiences, trauma related psychopathological symptoms and pain’s presence and intensity, in sexual violence victims. Methods The study enrolled 37 victims (men and women), aged between 14 and 50, with satisfactory cognitive level to respond to self-report inventories, without history of pain prior to the sexual violence experience and acute psychotic symptoms, seeking treatment for psychological distress due sexual violence victimization, admitted by an outpatient unit of a referral medical center, between 2020 and 2022. First, they underwent to a video call interview for screening, reception, and clarifications. Those who were eligible, after signing the consent form, underwent to “Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview” with psychiatrist, and physical assessment. Then, they responded to sociodemographic psycho-emotional and trauma related symptoms assessment, sexual violence, and pain related instruments. Statistical analyzes were performed using STATA 15. Results Most of participants are female (83.8%), Median age 33.4 (IQR [15;57]), Median education 12,6 (IQR [5;22]). According to table 1, the majority are victims of chronic violence (97.30%), with victimization experiences before age 13 (77.14%), between 13 and 18 years old (44.44%), and revictimization history in adulthood (29.62%). In addition to sexual abuse trauma, the most severe adverse childhood experiences found through were emotional abuse - Md16 IQR [9;22] (cutoff = 9) and emotional neglect - Md17 IQR [7;22] (cutoff = 10). This sample showed great vulnerability to another types of violence (27.7%) and difficulty in perceiving appropriate limits for intimacy (27.11%). According to table 2, they showed psychopathological symptoms of anxiety - Md20 IQR [0,40] (cutoff = 8), depression - Md22 IQR [0;42] (cutoff =10), stress - Md22 IQR [0, 42] (cutoff = 15). 28 (75.68%) participants reached the cutoff point for posttraumatic stress disorder. 22 participants showed light/moderate (61.11%), and 14 participants showed severe/extreme (38.89%) levels of difficulties in emotion regulation. According to table 3, pain is present for 34 (91.9%) of victims, average pain’s intensity - Md22 IQR [15; 27]). Through palpatory exploration, the pain founded was mainly localized in pelvic and respiratory muscles: psoas-R (75%), psoas-L (70.3%), iliac-R (45.9%), iliac-L (59.4%), diaphragm-R (56.8%) and diaphragm-L (51.3%). Conclusions This study described high frequency of pain presence-intensity, in sexual violence victims in childhood–adolescence lifetime, in our sample, especially in pelvic and diaphragm muscles. These findings of physical alterations in sexual violence victims should encourage further evaluations by physiotherapists and clinicians in collaboration with mental health team. As research implications, studies involving articulations of psychic and physical phenomena in response to traumatic situations are extremely necessary. More observational and interventional studies may improve therapeutic resources for this segment. Disclosure No.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207