MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405230293 · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c15378

Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Nanoendoscope for Quantification of a Protein Released under Physiological Stimulation in Brain Tissue

2024· article· en· W4405230293 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryam Hojjat Jodaylami, Ohini Yanis Sanvi, Ravi L. Rungta, Arlette Kolta, Jean‐François Masson

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et CultureUniversité de MontréalCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsBrain tissueRaman scatteringStimulationBiophysicsMaterials scienceBrain stimulationRaman spectroscopyChemistryNanotechnologyBiomedical engineeringNeuroscienceCell biologyMedicineBiologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) biosensor with minimal invasiveness and high spatial resolution has been developed as a nanoendoscope to detect changes in protein concentrations at specific sites in biological tissues. While generally applicable to various tissues or proteins, the SERS nanoendoscope is demonstrated for the quantitative detection of S100β, an astrocytic protein whose plasmatic levels are known to vary in several neuropathologies such as Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, Down syndrome, Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy, but for which intratissular levels have not been locally monitored, demonstrating key attributes of the SERS nanoendoscope. The SERS nanoendoscope is fabricated with densely and well-dispersed deposited gold nanoparticles modified with anti-S100β primary antibody on pulled optical fibers with a tip diameter of 700 nm, conducive to noninvasive and regiospecific detection of the S100β protein in different regions of mouse brain slices under different physiological stimuli with micrometer resolution. Quantification was performed ex vivo using SERS-active nanotags with secondary antibodies with detection limits of 5 and 7 nM in phosphate-buffered saline solution and mouse brain slice, respectively. Various physiological stimuli were then applied ex vivo to wild-type and S100β-knockout mouse brain slices to demonstrate the SERS nanoendoscope under physiological conditions. The average concentration of S100β was increased to 27, 45, and 48 nM upon N -methyl- d -aspartate, electrical, and optogenetic stimulation, respectively, statistically higher than all controls, demonstrating the ability of the SERS nanoendoscope to quantify protein release in biological tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS NanoSame topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207