MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405232398 · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slae114

MeerKAT discovery of a MIGHTEE Odd Radio Circle

2024· article· en· W4405232398 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R. P. Norris, B. Koribalski, Catherine Hale, M. J. Jarvis, Peter J. Macgregor, A. R. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Science and Technology AgencyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceH2020 European Research CouncilSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity of Colorado BoulderLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamUK Research and InnovationNational Science FoundationYunnan UniversityCape Peninsula University of TechnologyUniversity of ArizonaUniversiteit StellenboschYale UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignHeising-Simons FoundationSpace Telescope Science InstituteUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoHigh Energy Accelerator Research OrganizationUniversity of TokyoPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of VirginiaUniversity of UtahNew Mexico State UniversityNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanAlfred P. Sloan FoundationPrinceton UniversityUniversity of the Western Cape
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present the discovery of a new Odd Radio Circle (ORC J0219−0505) in 1.2 GHz radio continuum data from the MIGHTEE survey taken with the MeerKAT telescope. The radio-bright host is a massive elliptical galaxy, which shows extended stellar structure, possibly tidal tails or shells, suggesting recent interactions or mergers. The radio ring has a diameter of 35 arcsec, corresponding to 114 kpc at the host galaxy redshift of $z_{\rm spec} = 0.196$. This MIGHTEE ORC is a factor 3–5 smaller than previous ORCs with central elliptical galaxies. The discovery of this MIGHTEE ORC in a deep but relatively small-area radio survey implies that more ORCs will be found in deeper surveys. While the small numbers currently available are insufficient to estimate the flux density distribution, this is consistent with the simplest hypothesis that ORCs have a flux density distribution similar to that of the general population of extragalactic radio sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society LettersSame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207