MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405235946 · doi:10.3138/cjhs-2024-0022

Exploring sexual motivations underlying substance use: Gender perspectives, substance categories and substance use disorder severity

2024· article· en· W4405235946 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Mathieu Goyette, Nadine Blanchette-Martin, Joël Tremblay, Iris Bourgault Bouthillier, Francine Ferland, Sébastien Tchoubi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-NationaleCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesCentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de Chaudière-AppalacheUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstance usePsychologySubstance abuseClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sex under the influence of substances is a common sexual practice. Although they could explain engagement in sex under the influence of substances, few studies have explored sexual motivations driving substance use. To bridge this knowledge gap, this study aims to investigate differences in sexual motivations across genders and substance categories, and the link between substance use severity and sexual motivations. 188 adults (aged 18–74) took part in a comprehensive assessment interview addressing substance use Quebec Integrated Addiction Assessment – QIAA, including three sexual motivation items for three substance categories (alcohol, cannabis, other substances), and substance use severity World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI). Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and generalized estimating equations were used to compare sexual motivations among substance categories between men and women. A logistic regression assessed whether substance use severity could influence the presence of sexual motivations when considering gender and age. Results revealed an interaction between gender and substance categories on sexual motivations. Men were more likely to present sexual motivations and exhibited greater sex-related substance use motivations than women for substances other than alcohol and cannabis. Moreover, higher substance use severity scores were associated with the presence of sexual motivations for substance use. This study underscores the need to develop gender-sensitive interventions that consider sexual motivations underlying substance use. Consideration of sexual motivations could help identify the needs fulfilled by substance use and prevent triggers arising from sexual situations. Being among the first studies on the subject, continuing research in this area to further investigate sexual motivations underlying substance use remains essential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.272
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.066 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Human SexualitySame topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207