MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405236209 · doi:10.1364/ol.543313

Enhanced terahertz radiation directivity via a conical horn antenna from on-chip spintronic emitters

2024· article· en· W4405236209 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Grace C. Ciarniello, H. Bovee, C. S. Guthrie, B. N. Carnio, Basem Y. Shahriar, A. Y. Elezzabi

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOpticsDirectivityConical surfaceHorn antennaChipMaterials scienceAntenna (radio)Radiation patternFrench hornRadiationOptoelectronicsPhysicsTelecommunicationsSlot antennaAcousticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A circular waveguide-fed conical horn antenna is fabricated using two-photon lithography (TPL) and integrated with a spintronic terahertz radiation emitter source to provide enhanced radiation directivity. In comparison to the bare terahertz radiation source, incorporating the antenna permits a spectral density gain up to 20.5 dB. The antenna has a smaller footprint and operates at higher frequencies than other reported conical horns, thereby demonstrating the potential of two-photon lithography for the fabrication of terahertz structures for on-chip applications. The use of two-photon lithography for the fabrication of terahertz antennas is anticipated to support the development of technologies operating above 1 THz for broadband, next-generation wireless free-space communications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207