MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405238344 · doi:10.7202/1114882ar

Collecter les cartes interactives en ligne : portée et signification du dépôt légal pour un objet numérique complexe

2024· article· fr· W4405238344 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pierre Bonneau

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentation et bibliothèques · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les cartes interactives en ligne sont omniprésentes dans les usages des Français. Elles se trouvent de ce fait au coeur de la mission de dépôt légal de la Bibliothèque nationale de France, désormais étendue à tous les documents numériques. Pourtant, depuis le début du siècle, leur collecte bute sur l’organisation et la matérialité de ces cartes, sans commune mesure avec celle des unités documentaires habituellement reçues en bibliothèque. Cet article propose, en suivant ce cas pratique, d’examiner comment le dépôt légal et ses outils peuvent se renouveler pour tenir leurs objectifs documentaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentation et bibliothèquesSame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207