Spatial organization of multisensory convergence in mouse isocortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Abstract The diverse functions of different cortical areas are thought to arise from their distinct groups of inputs. However, additional organizing principles may exist in the spatial structure of converging inputs. We investigated spatial convergence patterns of projections from primary sensory areas to other areas throughout the mouse isocortex. We used a large tract tracing dataset to estimate the dimension of the space into which topographical connections from multiple modalities converged within each other cortical area. We call this measure the topography dimension (TD). TD is higher for areas that receive inputs of similar strength from multiple sensory modalities, and lower when multiple inputs terminate in register with one another. Across the isocortex, TD varied by a factor of 4. TD was positively correlated with hierarchy score, an independent measure that is based on laminar connection patterns. Furthermore, TD (an anatomical measure) was significantly related to several measures of neural activity. In particular, higher TD was associated with higher neural activity dimension, lower population sparseness, and lower lifetime sparseness of spontaneous activity, independent of an area’s hierarchical position. Finally, we analyzed factors that limited TD and found that linear correlations among projections from different areas typically had little impact, while diversity of connection strengths, both between different projections onto the same area, and within projections across different parts of an area, limited TD substantially. This analysis revealed additional intricacy of cortical networks, beyond areas’ sets of connections and hierarchical organization. We propose a means of approximating this organization in deep-network models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".