MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405242052 · doi:10.1128/jcm.01433-24

Targeted syndromic next-generation sequencing panel for simultaneous detection of pathogens associated with bovine reproductive failure

2024· article· en· W4405242052 on OpenAlexafffund
Dhinesh Periyasamy, Yanyun Huang, Janet E. Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsShared HealthUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersBeef Cattle Research CouncilMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsBiologyDNA sequencingVirologyComputational biologyGeneticsMicrobiologyMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bovine reproductive failure, which includes infertility, abortion, and stillbirth in cattle, leads to significant economic losses for beef and milk producers. Diagnosing the infectious causes of bovine reproductive failure is challenging as there are multiple pathogens associated with it. The traditional stepwise approach to diagnostic testing is time-consuming and can cause significant delays. In this study, we have developed a syndromic next-generation sequencing panel (BovReproSeq) for the simultaneous detection of 17 pathogens (bacteria, virus, and protozoa) associated with bovine reproductive failure. This targeted approach involves amplifying multiple pathogen-specific targets using ultra-multiplex PCR, followed by sequencing with the Oxford Nanopore platform and subsequent analysis of the data using a custom bioinformatic pipeline to determine the presence or absence of pathogens. We tested 116 clinical samples and found that BovReproSeq results matched with current diagnostic methods for 93% of the samples, and most of the disagreements occurring in samples with very low pathogen loads (Ct >35). At the optimal read-count threshold of 10 reads (minimum number of reads to classify the sample as positive), the clinical sensitivity of the assay was approximately 82%, while clinical specificity was 100%. The overall accuracy of the assay was 98.8%. Matthews correlation coefficient (correlation coefficient of binary classification) was approximately 0.90 and F1 score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) was 0.90, indicating excellent overall performance. Our study presents a significant advancement in detecting the infectious agents associated with bovine reproductive failure and the BovReproSeq panel's ability to detect 17 pathogens makes it a promising tool for veterinary diagnostics.IMPORTANCEBovine reproductive failure causes substantial economic losses to beef and milk producers, and infectious disease contributes significantly to this syndrome. Etiologic diagnosis is complicated since multiple pathogens can be involved and infections with some pathogens are asymptomatic or cause similar clinical signs. A stepwise approach to diagnostic testing is time-consuming and increases the risk of missing the correct diagnosis. BovReproSeq is a next-generation sequencing-based diagnostic panel that allows detection of 17 reproductive failure pathogens simultaneously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207