MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405242517 · doi:10.3390/ijerph21121644

Concurrent Experience of Self-Reported Mental Health Symptoms and Problematic Substance Use During the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Canadian Adults: Evidence from a Repeated Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey

2024· article· en· W4405242517 on OpenAlexaffabout
Md. Sabbir Ahmed, Mary Bartram, Robert L. Gabrys, Mansfield Mela, Nazeem Muhajarine

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsCanadian Centre on Substance Use and AddictionMental Health Commission of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMental Health Commission
KeywordsMental healthAlcohol Use Disorders Identification TestPsychiatryAnxietyCross-sectional studyMedicineAlcohol use disorderPsychological interventionPandemicCannabisSubstance abuseSuicidal ideationDepression (economics)Clinical psychologyLogistic regressionSuicide preventionPoison controlInjury preventionEnvironmental healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Alcohol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was aimed at identifying the prevalence of concurrent experience, poor mental health and problematic substance use, and its associated factors, among Canadian adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. A nationwide repeated cross-sectional sample of 14,897 Canadian adults (quota-sampled, weighted) were recruited on ten occasions between October 2020 and March 2022 using online panels. Concurrent experience was defined as mild to severe symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and/or anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) AND meeting screening criteria for problematic cannabis (Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test-Revised) and/or problematic alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test). Multivariable binary logistic regression models were fitted to identify the associated factors of concurrent experience using Stata v14.2 SE software. The pooled prevalence of concurrent experience was 17.12%, and 45.54% of the participants reported at least one experience (mental health symptoms or problematic substance use). The highest prevalence of concurrent experience per province was reported in Saskatchewan (19.4%) and the lowest in Quebec (13.6%). Younger adults, male respondents, those identifying as 2SLGBTQ+, self-reporting ethnocultural minority status, diagnostic history of mental health and substance use disorder, suicidal ideation, and lower ability to handle unexpected/difficult situations were significantly associated with concurrent experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. This analysis showed that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted mental health and substance use in interrelated ways. Data-driven province-specific interventions might be helpful toward a client-centered and integrated mental health and substance use care system in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→