MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405247999 · doi:10.1145/3705722

WiSleep: Smartphone-driven Sleep Population Monitoring with Unsupervised Learning

2024· article· en· W4405247999 on OpenAlex
Priyanka Mary Mammen, Camellia Zakaria, Tergel Molom-Ochir, Amee Trivedi, Prashant Shenoy, Rajesh Krishna Balan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersU.S. ArmyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsWearable computerComputer scienceSleep (system call)PersonalizationSoftware deploymentPopulationMachine learningWearable technologyArtificial intelligenceSupervised learningDeep learningHuman–computer interactionMedicineWorld Wide WebEmbedded systemArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With sleep deprivation being a public health concern, sleep monitoring technology, mainly through consumer-grade wearables, has shown value among users to better understand their most fundamental measure of health. Unfortunately, utilizing wearable technology is bound to the conditions of users owning these devices and using them at bedtime every night. While wearables can deliver highly personalized sleep insights to users, they inadvertently affect the ability of sleep monitoring solutions to reach unprivileged sections of society due to added costs and device accessibility. With our primary motivation to promote sleep monitoring for public health use cases at the population scale, we developed WiSleep , a sleep monitoring system that infers sleep duration from solely relying on a user’s smartphone without requiring a wearable device. Unlike prior efforts that use supervised learning methods and require labeled training data to train sleep models, our method is based on unsupervised learning, which enables easy deployment to new population groups or new regions without a need for labeled data collection and training. Specifically, we employ the smartphone activity of the user, represented by time series of WiFi network event rates, as input data to infer the user’s sleep duration (i.e., sleep time and wake time) through an unsupervised Bayesian change point detection ensemble model. Our evaluation shows WiSleep ’s efficacy in being a low-cost accessible sleep monitoring approach. We present results that yield comparable performance to prior techniques, particularly those requiring new users’ labeled data to achieve model personalization. System evaluation from a user study achieved an average of 93.68% accuracy within 59 minutes of sleep time error, 31 minutes of wake time error, and 57 minutes of sleep duration error by utilizing coarse-grained time series data. We demonstrate the application of our technique to predict sleep for 1,000 anonymous users and enable population-scale analytics with low computational overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it