MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405253521 · doi:10.5539/hes.v15n1p128

The Educational Guidance Platform via Artificial Intelligence Chatbot to Promote Vocational Aptitude for Vocational Students

2024· article· en· W4405253521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher Education Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAI and HR Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok
KeywordsVocational educationChatbotAptitudePsychologyMathematics educationArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePedagogyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The educational guidance platform via artificial intelligence chatbot to promote vocational aptitude for vocational students or the educational guidance platform via AI Chatbot is a research tool that was designed with the combination of educational guidance process, artificial intelligence technology, and chat platforms like LINE and Messenger. The platform in this study is intended primarily to be used as a tool to analyze vocational aptitude and provide personalized educational advice, which will assist learners to choose suitable programs for further study in vocational education level. This study were aimed to (1) study and synthesis the conceptual framework of the educational guidance platform via AI Chatbot, (2) develop the educational guidance platform via AI Chatbot, and (3) evaluate the results of the developed the educational guidance platform via AI Chatbot. There were nine participants from different institutions included in this research, derived by means of purposive sampling, and with experience in the design and development application. The research instruments include (1) the architecture the educational guidance platform via AI Chatbot, and (2) evaluation form on the architecture the educational guidance platform via AI Chatbot. The results of this study, which were derived from the study on the prototype design of the architecture of the educational guidance platform via AI Chatbot, are designated to be used as a guideline for future studies in order to develop the educational guidance platforms via AI Chatbot that can be put in practical use in an effective manner. The results of this study show that the overall suitability of the development of the architecture of the educational guidance platform via AI Chatbot is at strongly agree level. Nevertheless, there are still some research gaps in this study that need to be further addressed in the future. For instance, the future studies should cover a wider range of application of the developed platforms by conducting the survey with more diverse population and broader educational environments. This is to confirm the suitability of the development of the architecture of the educational guidance platforms via AI Chatbot that can be used as a guideline for future development coupled with the related technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it