THE USE OF INFRASTRUCTURE BONDS AS A TOOL FOR ATTRACTING INVESTMENT RESOURCES AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL: DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF THE ARCTIC STATES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article is devoted to the study of the use of infrastructure bonds in order to attract financial resources for the implementation of large infrastructure projects, primarily in the regions of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. The study analyzes the domestic experience of using this mechanism at the regional level. It is concluded that currently in the Russian Federation the issues of using infrastructure bonds are at the initial stage of application and require additional efforts on the part of federal and regional authorities to inform stakeholders. The article also analyzes the foreign experience of using infrastructure bonds to finance the construction and modernization of large infrastructure projects. The analysis showed that in the USA, Canada and European countries, the mechanism of attracting financial resources through the issuance and placement of infrastructure bonds has been used for several decades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it