Transformation of plastic debris to microplastics: An approximate analysis of mangrove environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Mangrove ecosystems serve as critical natural filters and retention points for continental waste entering the sea, making them primary accumulation sites for solid waste, such as plastics. These plastics undergo transformation from macroplastics to microplastics through weathering. We investigated the resistance and degradation process of plastic waste in the mangrove swamp of the Botanical Garden at the Autonomous University of Carmen, focusing specifically on its transformation into microplastics over time. By quantifying the collected waste and identifying by-products, we evaluated the degradation process of these materials, which impact the environment and become microplastics. Our analysis provided a detailed approximation of this transformation process through the quantification and examination of collected waste and its by-products. We explored the degradation dynamics and their environmental ramifications. Using data derived from collected waste samples, we estimated an annual generation of 12,300 kg of plastic waste and 1,351 kg of microplastics. This latter figure represents 11% of the total annual plastic waste, posing a significant threat to the biodiversity and ecological balance of mangroves. Our findings underscore the urgent need for more effective and sustainable waste management practices within these critical ecosystems. Furthermore, this research emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring and investigation of degradation processes to better understand the long-term effects of plastic pollution on mangrove environments and to develop effective strategies to mitigate its adverse impacts.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".