MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405256420 · doi:10.1002/mop.70049

A Wideband High Gain Transmit‐Array Antenna Exploiting Polarization‐Rotated Metasurface Cell

2024· article· en· W4405256420 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yamei Zhang, Feng Xu, Jingxia Qiang, Shui Liu, Qing Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsOpticsWidebandPolarization (electrochemistry)Antenna gainPhysicsAntenna (radio)Antenna apertureRadiation patternEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

ABSTRACT A novel polarization‐insensitive transmit‐array (TA) antenna using linear polarization‐rotated (PR) metasurface (MS) unit cells has been proposed in this article. Firstly, we design a wideband polarization‐insensitive polarization‐rotated MS unit cell. The MS cell can provide high transmission for incident linear polarized waves with polarization rotation by 90°. Then, we investigate the stability of the MS cell under the oblique incident wave. The proposed MS cell keeps a stable response under oblique incident wave over ± 30°. To verify the excellent performance of the proposed MS. We design a high‐gain TA antenna consisting of a standard feed horn and an aperture with a gradient phase. The gradient phase compensation is provided by varying the geometric dimension of the proposed MS. The obtained TA antenna works in a wide band with high gain. We fabricated the aperture and set up a prototype of TA antenna to verify our work. We measure the TA antenna and the results show a wide operating band from 14.2 to 18 GHz with a pick gain of 23.9 dBi. The favorable performance of the TA antenna is a good candidate in satellite systems and long‐distance satellite system. Furthermore, the angular stability of the MS cell is also verified by realizing the beam scanning performance. An over ± 30° scan range is obtained. Good beam scanning can be used in radar detection and expand signal coverage.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: fund_new · design weight: 1678.90 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Antenna engineering paper on a metasurface-based transmit-array; the object is a device design.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

This engineering study develops and tests a metasurface antenna, not research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Antenna engineering design of a transmit-array metasurface; applied physics/engineering.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207