MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405257145 · doi:10.3390/mca29060116

A PDE-ODE Coupled Model for Biofilm Growth in Porous Media That Accounts for Longitudinal Diffusion and Its Effect on Substrate Degradation

2024· article· en· W4405257145 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical and Computational Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiofilmDiffusionSubstrate (aquarium)Porous mediumMaterials scienceChemical engineeringChemical physicsChemistryMechanicsPorosityThermodynamicsBacteriaPhysicsGeologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive a one-dimensional macroscopic model for biofilm formation in a porous medium reactor to investigate the role of longitudinal diffusion of substrate and suspended bacteria on reactor performance. By comparing an existing base model—one without longitudinal diffusion, which was the point of departure for our work, to the new model—we noticed significant changes in system dynamics. Our results suggest that neglecting it can lead to underestimation of quenching length and biofilm accumulation downstream, even in the advection-dominated regime. The effects of attachment and detachment of suspended bacteria on biofilm formation and substrate degradation were also examined. In the one-dimensional model, it was found that attachment has a stronger influence on substrate depletion, which becomes more pronounced as diffusion in the pore space increases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it