MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405257275 · doi:10.1080/17502977.2024.2432814

Introducing Patchworked Peacemaking: Moving Beyond the Multitrack-Inclusion Nexus

2024· article· en· W4405257275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intervention and Statebuilding · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPeacebuilding and International Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeacemakingNexus (standard)Inclusion (mineral)MetaphorSociologyPeacebuildingIdeal (ethics)Openness to experiencePolitical scienceEpistemologyEnvironmental ethicsSocial scienceLawPolitical economyPhilosophyPsychologySocial psychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peacemaking policy commonly advances the notion that peace processes unfold across multiple ‘tracks’ that are linked and that complement each other, and that this to fosters greater inclusivity. The policy discourse surrounding what we term the ‘multitrack-inclusion nexus’ thus transports a highly ideal-typical and ‘neat’ understanding of how peace processes should unfold despite the messier practical realities of societies in conflict. In contrast, this Special Issue invites researchers and practitioners to move beyond the metaphor of tracks towards one of ‘patchworked peacemaking,’ which emphasises the interplay between the human, semiotic and material in efforts to end violence and mediate peace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it